- Synchronous CMC, Working Memory, and L2 Oral Proficiency Development
-
...payne/
September 2005, Volume 9, Number 3
pp. 35-54
Copyright © 2005, ISSN 1094-3501 35
SYNCHRONOUS CMC, WORKING MEMORY,
AND L2 ORAL PROFICIENCY DEVELOPMENT
J. Scott Payne & Brenda M. Ross
...
by Scott Payne, Brenda Ross
in Volume 09 Number 3, September 2005 Special Issue on Technology and Oral Language Development
- The Effects of Text-Based SCMC on SLA: A Meta Analysis
-
...Payne & Whitney (2002) 3 .77 .75
Payne & Whitney (2002) 1 .66 .64
Payne & Whitney (2002) 4 .62 .60
Payne & Whitney (2002) 2 .52 .51
Yilmaz & Yuksel (2011) 2 .41 .40
Blake (2009) 1 .39 ...
by Wei-Chen Lin, Hung-Tzu Huang, Hsien-Chin Liou
in Volume 17 Number 2, June 2013
- Measuring oral proficiency in distance, face-to-face, and blended classrooms
-
...Payne and Whitney (2002) and Payne and Ross (2005), would be extremely useful to see if the strong
text-based support and less pressured chat environment routinely cited as advantages of the DL learn...
by Robert Blake, Nicole L. Wilson, Maria Cetto, Cristina Pardo Ballester
in Volume 12 Number 3, October 2008
- Establishing an empirical link between computer-mediated communication (CMC) and SLA: A meta-analysis of the research
-
...Payne & Ross, 2005; Payne & Whitney, 2002; Wang, 2010) and oral proficiency and chat-room
discussion can be utilized to develop L2 oral proficiency (Payne & Whitney, 2002); (b) overall, e-mail
excha...
by Huifen Lin
in Volume 18 Number 3, October 2014
- Evaluating intelligent personal assistants for L2 listening and speaking development
-
...Payne & Whitney, 2002). Secondly, the
speaking test created by Payne and Whitney centers around a more simplified definition of oral proficiency
than the ACTFL OPI, specifically, the ability to prod...
by Gilbert Dizon
in Volume 24 Number 1, February 2020
- My first CMC article revisited: A window on Spanish L2 interlanguage
-
...Payne and Whitney (2002) found that keyboarding during CMC chats had a
significant positive effect on oral proficiency. However, Abrams (2003) found no such facilitating effect
for asynchronous CMC ...
by Robert Blake
in Volume 20 Number 2, June 2016 Special Issue of Special Issues: 20 Years of Language Learning & Technology
- Communication topics and strategies in e-mail consultation: Comparison between american and international university students
-
...Payne's (1997)
categories. Marbach-Ad and Sokolove (2001) identified two main categories: questions/comments about
class content and procedural questions, both of which also appear to overlap with P...
by Sigrun Bisenbach-Lucas
in Volume 09 Number 2, May 2005
- Oral computer-mediated interaction between l2 learners: it’s about time!
-
...Payne, J. S., & Ross, B. (2005). Synchronous CMC, working memory, and L2 oral proficiency
development. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 34–54. Retrieved from
http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num3/payne/d...
by Iñigo Yanguas
in Volume 14 Number 3, October 2010
- Multimodal glosses revisited: Interplay of individual differences and repeated exposures
-
...Payne (2004), it was
hypothesized that learners with lower WM would consult glosses more frequently. However, noting that
Chun and Payne did not manipulate gloss type, we remained open on whether gl...
by Ying Wu, Xiaoxue Liu, Yuanyuan Zhao, Xinyan Chen, Jianwu Gao
in Volume 29 Number 3, October 2025 Special Issue: Multimodality in CALL
- The role of technology in SLA research
-
...Payne, J. S., & Ross, B. M. (2005). Synchronous CMC, working memory, and L2 oral proficiency
development. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 35–54. Retrieved from
http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num3/payn...
by Dorothy M. Chun
in Volume 20 Number 2, June 2016 Special Issue of Special Issues: 20 Years of Language Learning & Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.