Search

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Ç Ł Ş

Showing 11 - 17 results of 17 for Jepson

Individual versus interactive task-based performance through voice-based computer-mediated communication
...Jepson, K. (2005). Conversations—and negotiated interaction—in text and voice chat rooms. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 79–98. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num3/jepson/default.html ...

by Gisela Granena
in Volume 20 Number 3, October 2016

Modality and task complexity effects on second language production in CMC
...Jepson (2005) also found that compared to communication in text chat, L2 audio chat interactions promote more negotiation of meaning. Jepson noted in particular that participants in the audio chat c...

by Rebecca Adams, Nik Aloesnita Nik Mohd Alwi, Umi Kalsom Binti Masrom
in Volume 27 Number 1, 2023

Modern language: Interaction in conversational NS-NNS video SCMC eTandem exchanges
...Jepson, 2005; Yanguas, 2010, 2012; Yanguas & Bergin, 2018). The increased availability and use of voice-based SCMC (SVCMC) technologies - whether audio (AudSCMC) or video (VidSCMC) - has transforme...

by Tripp Strawbridge
in Volume 25 Number 2, June 2021

Focus on form in task-based L2 oral computer-mediated communication
...Jepson, 2005; Kopf, 2012; Sykes, 2005; Yanguas, 2010, 2012); as a result, its applications in the L2 classroom and its implications for L2 learning remain largely untapped. Very interestingly, howev...

by Inigo Yanguas, Tyler Bergin
in Volume 22 Number 3, October 2018

Establishing an empirical link between computer-mediated communication (CMC) and SLA: A meta-analysis of the research
...Jepson, K. (2005). Conversations – and negotiated interaction – in text and voice chatrooms, Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 79–98. Retrieved from http://www.llt.msu.edu/vol9num3/jepson/defaul...

by Huifen Lin
in Volume 18 Number 3, October 2014

Investigating pragmatic learning opportunities and outcomes in different SCMC modes
...Jepson, 2005), thus learners need to achieve the task goal with limited typing speeds and have less opportunity to pay attention to linguistic items (Ziegler, 2016). As a result, in text mode, learn...

by Yuchen Peng, Yuhong Lei
in Volume 29 Number 3, October 2025 Special Issue: Multimodality in CALL

Measuring oral proficiency in distance, face-to-face, and blended classrooms
...Jepson, 2005; Lamy, 2004; Thompson & Hiple, 2005; Thorne & Payne, 2005; White, 2006; Zähner, Fauverge & Wong, 2000). Finally, available oral-proficiency testing instruments (e.g., ACTFL OPI, ILR O...

by Robert Blake, Nicole L. Wilson, Maria Cetto, Cristina Pardo Ballester
in Volume 12 Number 3, October 2008