LANGUAGE LEARNING & TECHNOLOGY
A refereed journal for L2 researchers and educators interested in the role of technology in advancing language learning and teaching.
Home About People Contact

Search

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Ç Ł Ş

Showing 471 - 480 results of 552 for Language for Special Purposes

The effectiveness of app-based and classroom-based instruction on L2 learning and motivation
...Language learners around the world are increasingly using applications (apps) to learn second/foreign languages (L2). However, research on the effectiveness of these apps for developing general langu...

by Beatriz González-Fernández, Inés de la Viña
in Volume 29 Number 1, 2025

Language proficiency over nonverbal sound effects in children's eBook incidental word learning
...for visual attention. About one to two weeks before the first reading session, children were evaluated for their general Mandarin proficiency (see Appendix D for examples) and their knowledge of ta...

by He Sun, Adam Roberts, Jessica Tan, Jieying Leh, Yvonne Cui Yun Moh
in Volume 29 Number 3, October 2025 Special Issue: Multimodality in CALL

Assistive design for English phonetic tools (ADEPT) in language learning
...language learning backgrounds, computer skills, previous strategies for learning L2 English, and goals for L2 learning. See Table 1 for a summary of participant information. It is noteworthy that n...

by Maritza Medina González, Debra M. Hardison
in Volume 26 Number 1, 2022

The effects of concordance-based electronic glosses on L2 vocabulary learning
...for this easy phrase. B2: I do not see any necessity for accessing additional information for map out. 44 Language Learning & Technology B1: I am not sure about this phrase… but it seems straight...

by Hansol Lee, Mark Warschauer, Jang Ho Lee
in Volume 21 Number 2, June 2017

Multimodal glosses revisited: Interplay of individual differences and repeated exposures
...for providing only the first letter, 0.3 for an incomplete response like “cam” (for “canimat”), and 0.8 for a nearly accurate response like “brandilon” (for “bandilon”). As interrater agreement was ...

by Ying Wu, Xiaoxue Liu, Yuanyuan Zhao, Xinyan Chen, Jianwu Gao
in Volume 29 Number 3, October 2025 Special Issue: Multimodality in CALL

Second language processing of errors in Korean-to-English machine-translated output
...languages pose the greatest processing cost for low proficiency learners whose priority in translation is to form acceptable sentences that structurally conform to the rules of the target language. ...

by Eun Seon Chung
in Volume 28 Number 1, 2024

Discourse and Participation in ESL Face-to-Face and Written Electronic Conferences
...foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 5, 455-465. Beauvois, M. H. (1998). Conversation in slow motion: Computer-mediated communication in the foreign la...

by Michael Fitze
in Volume 10 Number 1, January 2006

Collaborative writing and text quality in Google Docs
...formal language learning (pp. 157–177). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Strobl, C. (2014). Affordances of Web 2.0 technologies for collaborative advanced writing in a foreign language. CALICO J...

by Zsuzsanna I. Abrams
in Volume 23 Number 2, June 2019

The role of offline metalanguage talk in asynchronous computer-mediated communication
...for "every": daigaku "goto-ni" vs. daigaku "*tabi-ni" To choose one from two Japanese words for "position": daigaku no "*tachiba" vs. daigaku no "ichi" (for location) : The potential verb form for...

by Keiko Kitade
in Volume 12 Number 1, February 2008

Scaling up and zooming in: Big data and personalization in language learning
...formance by including language learning strategies and students’ knowledge of other foreign languages. A principal goal of Mr. Collins is to raise the language awareness of the student. Students are...

by Robert Godwin-Jones
in Volume 21 Number 1, February 2017 Special Issue on Methodological Innovation in CALL Research