- The role of technology in SLA research
-
...Olson, D. J. (2014). Benefits of visual feedback on segmental production in the L2 classroom. Language
Learning & Technology, 18(3), 173–192. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2014/olso...
by Dorothy M. Chun
in Volume 20 Number 2, June 2016 Special Issue of Special Issues: 20 Years of Language Learning & Technology
- Pronunciation development and instruction in distance language learning
-
...Olson, 2014; Smith, 2001)—researchers agree that perception and
production are inextricably linked (Derwing & Munro, 2015). Seeing that learners can rarely produce new
L2 sounds that they cannot dis...
by Ines A. Martin
in Volume 24 Number 1, February 2020
- Using apps for pronunciation training: An empirical evaluation of the English File Pronunciation app
-
...Olson, 2014) and waveform displays (Motohashi-Saigo & Hardison, 2009) to
help learners notice relevant aspects of pronunciation and promote improvements in the learners’
production of the target fea...
by Jonás Fouz-González
in Volume 24 Number 1, February 2020
- Visual reinforcement through digital zoom technology in FL pronunciation instruction
-
...Olson, 2016; Wrembel, 2007). Entering the new century, visual reinforcement techniques have gained
considerable support with the application of modern technology. Inspired by the popularization of
m...
by Siqi Wang, Jian Li, Qian Liang
in Volume 28 Number 1, 2024
- A system for adaptive high-variability segmental perceptual training: Implementation, effectiveness, transfer
-
...Olson, 2014; Patten & Edmonds, 2015; Suemitsu, Dang, Ito, & Tiede, 2015). Despite the
controversies, one phenomenon that holds true is that the development of perception and production is
inextricab...
by Manman Qian, Evgeny Chukharev-Hudilainen, John Levis
in Volume 22 Number 1, February 2018
- The potential advantages of using an LLM-based chatbot for automated writing evaluation for English teaching practitioners
-
...Olson, C. B. (2024). Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’
writing. Learning and Instruction, 91, Article 101894.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894
Teng...
by Kyungmin Kim, Jang Ho Lee, Dongkwang Shin
in Volume 29 Number 1, 2025
- Ubiquitous learning: Determinants impacting learners’ satisfaction and performance with smartphones
-
...Olson, M. H., & Baroudi, J. J. (1983). The measurement of user information satisfaction.
Communications of the Association for Computer Machinery, 26(10), 785–793.
Joiner, R., Nethercott, J., Hull, ...
by Hee-Jung Jung
in Volume 18 Number 3, October 2014
- GenAI-mediated activity theory (GMAT) for L2 teachers
-
...Olson, C. B. (2024). Comparing the
quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing. Learning and Instruction, 91,
Article 101894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894
Tan,...
by Jang Ho Lee, Yohan Hwang, Seongyong Lee
in Volume 30 Number 1, 2026
- E-mail and word processing in the ESL classroom: How the medium affects the message
-
...Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literature, language, and
learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp. 105-123). New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Collot, M., & Belm...
by Sigrun Biesenbach-Lucas, Donald Weasenforth
in Volume 05 Number 1, January 2001
- Effect of using texting on vocabulary instruction for English learners
-
...Olson & N. Torrance
(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 112–133). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University
Press.
Song, Y. (2008). SMS enhanced vocabulary learning for mobile audiences. Inte...
by Jia Li, Jim Cummins
in Volume 23 Number 2, June 2019
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.