- The effects of feedback type and explicit associative memory on the effectiveness of delayed corrective feedback in computer-mediated communication
-
...Yilmaz and Sağdıç (2019) focused
on inhibitory control, whereas Arroyo and Yilmaz (2017) focused on language analytic ability. Neither
study showed a statistical interaction between the cognitive ID...
by Yucel Yilmaz, Gisela Granena, Laia Canals, Alexandra Malicka
in Volume 28 Number 1, 2024
- Focus on form in task-based L2 oral computer-mediated communication
-
...Yilmaz, 2011; Yilmaz & Granena, 2010) investigated task
effects in SCMC. However, none of these studies was carried out in an oral SCMC context and only Yilmaz
and Granena (2010), Yilmaz (2011), and...
by Inigo Yanguas, Tyler Bergin
in Volume 22 Number 3, October 2018
- The effects of face-to-face and computer-mediated recasts on L2 development
-
...Yilmaz, 2013; Yilmaz & Grañena, 2016), learners’ level of proficiency
(Philp, 2003; Trofimovich et al., 2007), learners’ age and type of interlocutor (Mackey et al., 2003), type
of target linguistic...
by Nektaria-Efstathia Kourtali
in Volume 26 Number 1, 2022
- Promoting grammatical development through multimodal digital recasts in video-conferencing tasks
-
...Yilmaz, 2012) or face-to-face and text-based
recasts (e.g., Kourtali, 2022; Yilmaz, 2012; Yilmaz & Yuksel, 2011).
Yeonwoo Jung and Andrea Révész 3
For instance, Yilmaz and Yuksel (2011)...
by Yeonwoo Jung, Andrea Révész
in Volume 28 Number 1, 2024
- The Effects of Text-Based SCMC on SLA: A Meta Analysis
-
...Yilmaz & Yuksel (2011) 1 .87 .84
Payne & Whitney (2002) 3 .77 .75
Payne & Whitney (2002) 1 .66 .64
Payne & Whitney (2002) 4 .62 .60
Payne & Whitney (2002) 2 .52 .51
Yilmaz & Yuksel (201...
by Wei-Chen Lin, Hung-Tzu Huang, Hsien-Chin Liou
in Volume 17 Number 2, June 2013
- Effect of formulaic sequences on fluency of English learners in standardized speaking tests
-
...Yilmaz & Koban Koc, 2020). An even smaller
number of these studies focus on the use of FS in the speech of young and adolescent English learners
(Eyckmans et al., 2015; Mohammadi & Enayati, 2018; Pu...
by Jennifer François, Mohammed Albakry
in Volume 25 Number 2, June 2021
- The interplay between metalanguage, feedback, and meaning negotiation in oral interaction
-
...Yilmaz & Granena, 2010; Ziegler & Phung, 2019). However, as Akiyama (2014) points out,
there is a need to examine focus on form in video SCMC and VE settings, an area which remains under-
researched ...
by Laia Canals
in Volume 26 Number 1, 2022
- Augmented reality technology in language learning: A meta-analysis
-
...Yilmaz et al., 2022).
Although most research on the application of AR in language learning shows positive results (e.g., Tsai,
2020; Geng & Yamada, 2020; Mozaffari & Hamidi, 2022), some studies ar...
by Juan Wu, Huiting Jiang, Shiya Chen
in Volume 28 Number 1, 2024
- Pragmatic feedback on refusals in a computer-simulated advising session
-
...Yilmaz, 2012).
In a recent review of CF studies in pragmatics, Bardovi-Harlig and Yilmaz (2021) identified nine studies
with research questions addressing the role of feedback in L2 pragmatics instr...
by Paul Richards
in Volume 28 Number 1, 2024
- Individual versus interactive task-based performance through voice-based computer-mediated communication
-
...Yilmaz (2012) both found that implicit and explicit corrective feedback types are helpful in
SCMC. Specifically, metalinguistic information in Sauro (2009) and recasts and explicit correction in
Yil...
by Gisela Granena
in Volume 20 Number 3, October 2016
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.